Does everything have a cause-effect relationship? And if yes, is it necessary, is it even possible, to assign and define the cause of everything that happens?
I have read some 50 blog posts in the last few hours, a good percentage of which were some very old posts on my own blogs. I notice that inquisitiveness is one of the basic, and infact good qualities of human beings. I also realise I question a lot, and a lot of my blog posts, including this one, begin/end with a question. Most of the times I do not have a definite answer to the question. At least to begin with. But reflection is a wonderful activity. At least most of the times. As I keep saying, moments of clarity are good for the soul, and most bright ideas come in the middle of complete chaos. Or maybe that's what they call the 'voice from within' that suddenly tells you what you always knew, but never knew you did. Which then, means, that 'why' is not that bad a question afterall, even though it has a risk of being reduced to rhetoric.(A good example of rhetoric would be "why am I the way I am?". A wasted 'why'. )
But the problem for me is when the question changes to "Tell me why, and do that quickly!".
The rider of time, or the vice of haste, couple with the question to reduce it's worth to often pitiable amounts, because the most brilliant questions do not have immediate answers. Similarly the most brilliant answers did not come with a constraint on time.
I think "What?"is a good question. "How much?" is helpful too at times. They help in identifying and acknowledging something that deserves attention. But "why?"needs more then just a little attention. And I wouldn't tell you why I say this, because I'm still figuring that bit out properly.
But still, having said this, Í'm not sure if there can and should be a'' why'' that is answerable all the time.
Reason, they say, is something all fears would fail in the light of. Perhaps. But I'm not convinced, yet.
"Why do I work?", for instance is something I'd like to ask myself, because it'd give me direction and perspective. "Why do I live?"is philosophy, and it's one of those things that'good to ask without obsessively waiting for the complete answer. "Why do I love?", however, is something I can never answer and I shall never ask. Because logic doesn't work, not for me, atleast, where passion can.
I'm faced with several whys in my life at the moment, and I simultaneously believe that whys are good questions and bad questions; they should be answered and they should not be answered, or even asked. I don't know what's right now. I'm struggling with many too many becauses.
You can blame me that I hardly ever take a stand, but I am genuinely confused at the moment(it's exam time afterall; I'm bound to be haunted with existentialism!).
Somebody tell me why does there have to be a 'because' to everything?
14 comments:
1+1 = 2
1-1 = 0
You see what this '=' is supposed to do and what it ends up doing instead . . .
we rarely write '2 = 1 + 1' . . .
now wheather we write 1+1 = 2 or 2 = 1+1, this '=' always comes, this '=' is the symbol of cause and effect relationship, this '=' drags 'because' from collar and runs all over the black corridors, then breaking the big clear wiped glass pane window, it jumps from 13th floor, down to busy highway!
And dead.
And no one cries for dead 'because'!! Pity!
becoz its xam time dear:(((((
by reading this yaad aa gaya kal mera xam hain
and becoz ,may b everyone is confused so thtsy they add "becoz":PPPPP
50 posts!! yaar aise time waste mat kar... padho aur padhao... dunya ko sakshar bano!
As for the question "why do we live?" the answer is simple.. because there is nothing better to do!
Exams change many thoughts.
[varun]
we write 2=1+1 in computer programz. and 'why' are u blaming a poor equal to? alas..not all becauses die so easily anyway!
[megha]
Hmm....good luck to both of us.
[pradyot]
good one.
how about dying though?
[the anon]
...and mutilate the rest to death.
I think "What?"is a good question. "How much?" is helpful too at times. They help in identifying and acknowledging something that deserves attention. But "why?"needs more then just a little attention.
come to think of it...
This "why" of yours is wat leads to "how" n "what"...
As I keep saying, moments of clarity are good for the soul, and most bright ideas come in the middle of complete chaos.
Thats a good thought, however, I do feel that that a stage of complete chaos cannot lead to any bright ideas, it only forces us to accept an existing solution, and rename it as a bright idea. Yes, but semi-chaotic situations, may lead to what you refer to as bright ideas, as they have some logic and innovative thinking associated with them. You may agree to disagree with this thought, though.
Somebody tell me why does there have to be a 'because' to everything?
There doesnt necessarily have to be a 'because' to everything...for example, tell me why we havent yet been able to provide an answer for the happenings at the Bermoda Triangle...and then, you yourself mentioned a question which will never have a 'because' associated with it...Why do I love?
You know what...something cannot be pressed foward at all...something really need time....unquestioningly. All has to have is the patience to wait....and accept whatever is the outcome. And yup, hope does play a major role in this drama.. :)
don mind...but what's the point of thinking so much or better say 'why' to think so much! :/
>>Somebody tell me why does there have to be a 'because' to everything?
Looks like you've already answered your first question Does everything have a cause-effect relationship?.
I think it is human nature to find out why something happens, so we'll always be looking for a 'because' for everything, and this search will lead to more searches.....
Don't worry, you're only human. You're bound to wonder why.
had to quote Ghalib here
na tha kuch to khuda tha, kuch na hota to khuda hota
duboya mujhe ko hone ne, na main hota to kya hota
hui muddat ki ghalib mar gaya par yaad aata hai
tera har baat par kehna ki yoon hota to kya hota
take care
[aberrant[]
the first two identify the problem, it is why that addresses the solution, if at all.
[tapasya]
i shall agree to disagree. there's nothing like semi-chaos. whe u can think in chaos u call it semi-chaos.
Agrreed, but what abt cause effects then?
[chitra]
that's a nice thougth. hope, and patience.:)
[monks]
that's convenient! :|
and escapist....
[pandora]
because it is exam time.
because i am crazy.
because...
sigh...
[vivek]
thanx for the reassurnce. not many ppl call me human:P
[zyborg]
good one. i realise the whole ghazal is relevant here:)
@phoenix
He he, c'mon you could not even catch the perennial criminal '='. he is not as poor as u consider him to be.
@PHOENIX
Hey who the hell said all because die easily, infact rarely ever a because dies easily, these because guyz are very hard to kill even.
Post a Comment