I start with a line I read on some blog a few days: "The spirit of Indians as a people is over-whelmingly warm; yet, the warmth and instant connection one may say between Indian and Indian is sadly found wanting when it comes to Indian and India." Also fresh in my memory is a question raised in a book review I was reading last weekend that asked: "What does patriotism mean to the common man?"
Rhetorical, yet worth thinking the question is. People are peculiar, especially the moment you start attributing general characteristics and tendencies to them in groups, and of all peoples, Indians have their own well-earned reputation for peculiarities and eccentricities, which is both laudable and remarkable in its own right. Now, keep aside the initial images of frenzied media hype, of rhetorical loud Sunny Deol dialogues, of "Ae watan, ae watan..." Chorus-singing competitions in school, of war movies, Pakistan, of saffron, green and white that spring to the mind when one thinks of "patriotism", and then think what does it really mean to you. I'm afraid this is a question quite tough for most of us to answer, especially honestly and unambiguously. What is it that you really feel for your country? And what is it that you really need to?
I have to admit that my brief stay abroad actually went a long way in helping me reflect and develop a deep perspective and appreciation for India. Once I was away from it, I could see the identity of the nation and its people and its characteristics, I could also appreciate its strengths, weaknesses and complacence from a third-persons' view, and most of all, I could determine whether I actually felt the 'love' for the country separately from the immediate environment where I resided the way I had been accustomed to proclaiming since childhood in "I love my India.." songs.
I believe that a temporary period of distance from anything that's been an integral part of our lives so much that we've hitherto always taken it as granted, always produces either of two extreme reactions in the mind: either you realise its deficiencies, lack of necessity/functionality etc and discard regard for it to a great extent in favour of new-found replacements, or you realise its importance/your regard for it, miss it and actually value it more if and when you get it back. People's relationship with their nations are also like that. People who move abroad either being hyper-actively and enthusiastically 'Indian' or begin scorning at it as the developing, full-of-social-and-economic-evils place.
My own opinion here is not so important, although I always rejoice as I increasingly see people in my generation preferring India as the place to work and to reside in even to the disadvantage of lesser evil and coming back from visits abroad as students charmed by the 'holiday' but yet feeling like coming home. So much for brain drain. The point which finally got me to write this post was the other end of this mass patriotism, or whatever it is that we feel, that leads us to aggressively establish our identity and connection with an Indian. It's the same aggression and natural bonding that you'd see among any two Indians who accidentally meet up in any part of the globe on a metro station. It's the same aggression a cricket match unites people from all strata of life otherwise ready to kill over religion, caste, quota in supporting eleven men wearing blue. It's the same aggression because of which Kalpana Chawla's achievements are proudly labelled Indians and celebrated in mass hysteria, tears and joy. It's the same aggression which makes one track Sunita Williams, who's never been to India, as she lands safely on Planet Earth.
So far, so good. But there are questions unanswered.
Is this aggression good or bad? Is THIS what patriotism is and should be? If yes, or acceptably yes, then why isn't that aggression visible between Indian and India like between Indian and Indian? Meaning thereby, why don't we protect the cleanliness of our roads, the harmony of our society, the poor of this India, fight the corruption and let our pride work for removing its deficiencies than hiding them? Why the "chalta hai" attitude there? And then again, the other question, we aggressively proclaim Sunita Williams as Indian, but why not Salman Rushdie who's actually far more connected to the country and its culture and brought equal if not more laurels but has been banned and banished here. Why disown Indian doctors in Australia found guilty of terror attacks while continue to aggressively acknowledge and claim pride in Silicon Valley's Indianness?
Too many questions right. I can't answer for the people of the whole of this country, but even as far as I'm individually concerned, my mind is still too busy figuring out the right middle path between zealous exuberance, pride, shame, responsibility, prudence and lastly, patriotism.
Hum logon ko samajh sako to samjho dilbar jaani
ulti seedhi jaisi bhi hai apni yehi kahani
Phir bhi dil hai hindustani....
18 comments:
saying na something !!
really nothing to say
sayad main bhi aise hi conclude karun
"hum logo ko samajh sako to samjho..."
just one more thing, it is not the place that makes people good or bad it is the people who make a place good or bad and going by theory of stochasticity there will b always a mix of two groups at any place...
< Meaning thereby, why don't we protect the cleanliness of our roads, the harmony of our society, the poor of this India, fight the corruption and let our pride work for removing its deficiencies than hiding them? Why the "chalta hai" attitude there >
Maybe because by nature,we are a bit lazy, not willing to do the hard yards, I mean it doesnt take too much to track a Sunita Williams or the Indian cricket team ;)
Having said that, there are people working on all of what you've mentioned...yes,more peopl need to be involved, but you cant say it is not happening at all
Aggression?...not sure if that is the right word,I think its more the fact that we relate to other Indians more easily than to people from other cultures...that partly arises from the uniqueness of our nation and culture and maybe(I'm just speculating) because we are a bit resistant to changing ourselves compared to people from other nations...
Some of the other questions you've raised in the last para(about Salman Rusdie for instance), have more to do with politics, than with the people as such...
And what does patriotism mean to the common man?
Hmm...does it mean much?...I think saying "I'm an Indian" to most people essentially is a sense of identification, a sense of belonging to a group, more than anything else...any love that we have towards the nation mostly comes through this sense of belonging
PATRIOTISM..hmmm..thats an interseting question for my,seeing as i have spent only 7 years of my life here...well..i just love the feeling of bieng at home and the freedom i have here!!
Great post as usual . Proud to be INDIANS
I remember one thing, a European friend once told me she dowsnt quite understand why Indians always shout and talk in groups, whereas average decibels in her country are much less :)
Flew around after centuries, and u writing great as always :)
someone once remarked - i went to India and met Bengalis, Tamils, Punjabis, Gujaratis, Marwaris... but no Indian!.
Makes me realise that the Patriotism hawked by the Media is just another example of crass capitalism raping emotion.
sensible one....:)
U r rocking!!
The common man, if he leaves India, is never able to give himself a good reason as to why really he did it or what is his net gain out of it. (Or even if he's just planning, these questions remains unanswered - why really should he do it and what'll be the net gain.) I think this no answer situation is what patriotism is. Within the country, I don't think it means much now, that's why less 'aggression' between Indian and India.
(but again, that's just my hasty opinion)
phoenix:
thats a good line of thought.
only when i got to live in a hostel where we had students from all over india, it was only then, that i was constantly asked about who i was and from where i belonged. being born and brought up at a relatively young city like chandigarh-i would "obviously" state the name.but the question that followed was, "where do your parents belong to?" and i would answer "punjab". after a few such incidents i started giving "punjab" as my answer to any question regarding where i belonged.
although i have not spent much more than a handful of summer vacations there, i still had that as my answer because, it helped me "define" and "catgorise" myself.
i have/had no attachments with the state at all. but then the "ease" of "fitting in" made it easier. i guess so is the case with indians all over india.
also, like everywhere else, you will find that the students from punjab would generally put up "bhangra items" in the college and these are the same chaps who would vow not to know even the "b" of "bhangra" in their own villages, cities etc.
its all mostly fitting it.
"absence makes the heart grow fonder" isnt it?
also as to why most of the indians dont "value" india as much as they value being indian is because most of us are little spoilt brats who expect everything to take care of itself or our "mothers" to do it for us.this however, can also be a result of living in the same condition and growing used to the surroundings. for eg, i have often noticed that people from chandigarh would never litter, partly because thats the way we have grown up here.
with our aging years develops a feeling of complacency!
We love you Blog
[voice]
People and places compliment, and hence the complacency shows..in India, in Indians, in vanity and pride, in humility and flexibility.
[azeem]
Yep, the freedom in India is worh making people jealous anywhere. The democracy, the secularism and the ease of life, being who u are...and also the freedom to ruin these very thigns with carelessness :)
[mnowluck]
thanks :)
[canary]
Something like warmth between Indian and Indian overflowing!! :P
Frankly i like the Indian shor...the European silence isnt really peace..it's lonely and deafening too
[ab]
I'm not too sure about the laziness as a good enough excuse. Indians are not that lazy, relatively. It's just about cheering the victors, the glorious and the least controversial of them all. Infact colonial baggage can explain a large part of such behavorial tendencies and exagerrated pride.
I know things are starting to change, but it's too little a change, and it's not yet engraved in common consciousness.
To what I wanted to convey, even though i may not have exactly managed to do that properly, aggression was the right word.
It is an aggressive pride with which we claim ownership on some things and overlook the others.
I personally love the Indian to Indian bonding myself, and it's not that unique, for Chinese cling on to Chinese and French to French with equal zeal.
But on your take on politics, I'm tempted to say that at some level, the politics of a society is a mere reflection of the society itself...and its shortcomings a mere reflection of the apathy and the indifference of the society as such.
Identity..well that would take another...few more i guess..posts.
[oracle]
I'm not sure I share ur rrather extreme view rubbishing the concept of patriotism, for though it is definiely not the hyped up dressed up doll media sells us, it's not toally absent either. Just that it's too dormant..or smthng. I havent reached my conclusions yet
[jeya anand]
:) thanks.
[vibhav]
Fine, we are a confused lot. Okay? Only absence makes us realise wat what is to us.
[PoisOn CoAtEd ELiXir]
I for one dislike the classification, as oracle says, which labels us as punjabis bangalis gujaratis and anything but indians. I dont feel too much of it having lived in delhi forever, but the states have a strong regionalist feeling. And it is interesting to point out that watever complacency has killed the India-Indian aggression doesnt exist when it comes to the Marathi-Maharashtra and other similar connections. Isn't that a comment in itself as to how we look upon ourselves?
And just to extend this further, I wonder how many of we six billion on this plant would be proud earthlings if we were to interact with people on another plant.
for me, the nation are its people, not the land, the barren geography, but the billion plus breathing, pulsating India. to me patriotism is an act of helping this sea of humanity move another inch towards freedom - freedom from having to beg, freedom from being labelled as the poor and stricken, freedom from hunger, freedom from iliteracy... I care two hoots if the 11 fools lose the cricket match or their own lives in an ad accident - it is this mass that is the country for me. No one can be Indian and scorn on these people who make up the nation.
Phoenix, I think you misunderstood me. Iam not rubbishing the concept of Patriotism rather that of Jingoism that has been given the color of Patriotism.
[arpz]
Quite agree with and totally respect your views..and in a way they also answer my question of the meaning of patriotism :)
In any case, if you thought so, I was never attempting to scorn on anybody, least of all ourselves.
[oracle]
Hmm...well on that i agree. but our crazy media hypes everything for sensationalism doesn't it?
and then, that;s what sells too.
nahin nahin! i wasnt saying you scorned on anyone, I guess i just got carried away in the "jai hind" fervor :D maafi if I rubbed u the wrong way :)
Post a Comment