- is a man who can't take responsibility.
- is a man who can't take responsibility for his feelings, or the lack of them.
- and, very importantly, is a man in their lives who can't take responsibility for her feelings.
Which is, for me, a little processed thought, a little raw truth. What say?
13 comments:
was just thinking how many posts on blogospere, articles in magazines and newspapers, books or discussions among friends would have been on the topic, ' what MEN definitely won't want' :P
I think the first category encompasses the next twos.
And to answer ach_85:
What men definitely don't want is a woman with a convulsive mind (as straight as a jalebi)
ek sawaal .. maybe a trivial one but still wanna know
Are 'taking responsibility' and 'being responsible' different things or same?
Same at our end I guess...
well said!
Completely agree with wht u hav said. :) Btw i jus came across ur blog while browsing thru different blogs.
I guess these things holds for all the human beings independent of gender. I think you can surely generalize this one!!
I guess nobody wants an irresponsible partner or the person who either have strong feelings for you or is incapable of generating strong feelings for him/her!! ;)
what is "responsibility"?
[ach_85]
It's a sufficiently important/discussed topic, you know..just that the answers are far simpler, n a lot of discussions happen in girls' chatrooms and hostel rooms (and phonecalls and nightouts) than in a magazine. It's a lesser mystery, you see.
[anand]
It does, in a way, but then there's a reason why I chose to put it that way, and why was the emphasis on specific things so explicit. Somehow responsible people also do not consider a few important things within the domain of their consideration.
[divesh]
Not a bad question at all, and the answer is they are different. The subtelty of that difference, however, is ebst left to be analyzed by you than being worded by me
[vibhav]
Good thing, no?
Yet confusing?
[chandni]
:)
[ria]
Hey, thanks for the visit and the comment. :)
[geetika]
:) Sure, if you think so. Nobody wants it, maybe, I just put tone of the necessary conditions, by no yardstick sufficient ones.
[burf]
Brilliant. Exactly the question that I was looking to get to this post. However, exactly the answer I do not want to give for anyone in explicit words, for reasons I think you understand.
This condition necessary n sufficient thing always remind me of those stupid analysis theorem n derivations! :D
Finally some explanation on why I'm never wanted by anyone [-(
Post a Comment